Sourcing Location without Getting Lost

There are so many different ways to find candidates. The variety of searches and candidate sources make it worthwhile to try these different methods out. But not all methods are created equal. And some don’t have all the information in once place.

What about location, for example? Sure, these great searches will find you many candidates, but what about candidates in your part of the pond?If you are someone who sources all the time in your job or only part of the time, you still want to get as much information as you can for these searches.

So let’s talk about location. In order to add a location aspect to your search, wherever it may be, you need to first figure out the different ways that your audience will reference that specific location. They could include ANY of the follow and more:

• City names – This is pretty obvious, though you have to watch out for false positives.  (i.e. you search for “Zurich” as a search term, but you find a candidate who lives in San Francisco and they attended the ETC Institute)
• Country names – Same reasoning as the city name searches.  Also, hint: you may want to think about translating cities and countries into their native language
• Regional names – Not every location has a snappy regional name that goes with it.  For example, regional names like “Bay Area” or “Sophia Antipolis” or “Research Park Triangle” do exist.  But not every region has one.
• Websites – This is the one that gets missed many times.  If you are sourcing for your country or a different one, then all you have to do is reference the country domain.  The idea here is that a page that resides on a server in Poland will come from a .pl website.  This is not full-proof but it’s still better than nothing!

Actionable Search

Here is an example of how to put this into action.  We want to target GitHub profiles in the Czech Republic.  Normally for a Google search of GitHub profiles, you will start with a base string:

site:github.com “block or report”

And then you would add a focus, language or type of software that the user is working on (in this case, artificial intelligence / computer science background):

site:github.com “block or report” (“algorithm” OR “algorithms” OR “machine learning” OR “neural network” OR “deep learning” OR “pattern recognition” OR “computer vision”)

Now that string will get you a lot of people.  But we want to focus the search for a specific location.  In this case, we want the Czech Republic:

site:github.com “block or report” (“algorithm” OR “algorithms” OR “machine learning” OR “neural network” OR “deep learning” OR “pattern recognition” OR “computer vision”) (Česko OR Česká OR prague OR brno OR Czechia OR Czech OR “www * cz” OR “http * cz” OR “https * cz”)

Woah.  What is happening?

So yes, there are many cities in the Czech Republic.  And there are many different ways that you may reference your location.  There are also users who might not mention their location at all.  So instead, we look for the terms that will get us the highest yield.  We include capitals, major cities and countries in English and Czech.  When you do so, you end up with a few more candidates that you would not have found.

Also, some users will not post location but they will post a personal website.  If you search pages that come from the country, then you would look for http://www.anydomain.cz (since people may post with the world wide web host or hypertext transfer protocol, then you search for “www * cz” OR “http * cz” OR “https * cz” as well).  Since we don’t know how many words exist between www or http or https and cz, we will use Google‘s fill-in-the-blank operator, the * which takes the place of missing words.

In Conclusion

Make sure to try out these searches on your own and for the part of the world that you are sourcing for.  As always, make sure to translate jobs and software into multiple languages.  You will find more candidates when you do!

This sourcing method and thought process will be just one of many that we cover at the upcoming EVOLVE Masterclass that is being held in Prague and Budapest.  There are only a few seats left, so sign up at www.evolvemasterclass.com

See you then!

Mark Tortorici
Founder & Training Expert
Transform Talent Acquisition

Advertisements

It’s Australian for Sourcing, mate

Helloooo everyone, I’m back!  Now most you are are saying to yourself, “when were you gone?”  But I can tell you that I have been on a tour with Derek Zeller (@derdiver), Matt Charney (@mattcharney), and the rest of the ATC Events gang (@atcevent) speaking at the Sourcing Social Talent conferences.  #SST2014

It was a whirl-wind adventure visiting Sydney, Melbourne, and Auckland within the space of 10 days while speaking at a conference in each city.  I wanted to share my observations with everyone about the state of sourcing over there, the industries they focus on, the types of reqs they get, and the solutions that we came up with.

The Conferences

The reason for my semi-cheesy picture on this post is for a very good reason.  The 2 speakers that I was with had some very good content woven into their presentations.  Matt Charney presented the reasons why recruiting is so far behind marketing in terms of messaging and content.  And this included the USA!  The message was simply (and brilliantly): recruiting = marketing = sourcing = recruiting.  Anyone who argues against that fact doesn’t understand their job very well.

Derek Zeller talked about candidate interaction and the power of candidate bonds.  You may not end up placing that candidate, but do the extra work to make them feel like a person (rather than a metric) and it will pay off for you.  Also, Derek asked the audience who the best sourcer was and then put up a picture of Professor Xavier.  Hence, my funny picture reference to Australia (please don’t get mad at me, NZ for lumping you guys in with AUS, but I didn’t have time to write 2 separate posts!)

The Future of Recruiting

Looking into the future is sometimes easy to do, if you know where you’re going.  You don’t even need a time machine.  So what what about the future of recruitment?  Well the answers have been here all along.  The signs are continuously pointing to what recruitment is, and what it will look like in the future:

1. Sourcing has been evolving and continues to do so – Heywaitasecondhere….isn’t this a blog post about recruiting? Yes, it is.  But the role of the sourcer has evolved.  At SourceCon in Denver this year, I spoke about the Modern Day Sourcer and what they do.  Part of the talk focused on the increasing skills of candidate engagement, technical know-how, and candidate closing that many sourcers of today possess.  These increased and expanding skills will change recruiting.  But don’t worry, it will be for the best.  This just means that recruiters will take up more sourcing and technical skills as well, which will blur the lines between the two roles even more.
2. Everyone knows where everyone is – Internet search, cold calling, networking, and good ol’ fashioned detective work have made it very easy to find just about anyone.  Once you know how to find these people the only thing that really matters is engagement.  Which brings me to my third point…
3. Content is the new recruiting AND sourcing – I have to give my colleague Jim Stroud credit here, since he has a book called “Content is the New Sourcing”.  But I want to take that a step further for recruiters.  The content of any and all recruitment branding should be handled with the polish, targeting, and forethought that corporate marketing teams use. So besides the content of landing pages, blogs, candidate emails, and social media sites, the verbal communication between the recruiter and candidate must be targeted, precise, and sound like it’s coming from someone who will work directly alongside of the candidate once they are hired.  Establishing that rapport and demonstrating the knowledge of the job, team, company and industry is paramount.  We need to sound less like sales and more like fellow engineers.
4. Speak to your candidate, not their demographic – Long gone are the days of “we are a 10 ten company to work for…join us”.  The reason why those days are gone is because every candidate in this market has a ton of “top companies” that they can choose from.  The courtship between candidate and corporation needs to be even more precise, personalized, and above all…honest.  Candidates can easily detect if your company is full of B.S. or if there are a host of unhappy employees behind that recruiter’s smile.  So instead, find out everything there is to know about your candidate and speak to the motivating factors that drive them.  I’ll give you a hint: it’s not all about money $$$$$.

In the end, the only way this will work is if we all step up our game.  Yes, personalization takes time.  Yes, learning about every single technical aspect of your company takes time.  Yes, you can easily just post jobs and catch whatever gets caught in your net.  But are you getting the job done?  Or are you putting a piece of duct-tape over a burst pipe?  Sure it works at the moment.  But if there’s one thing I know about the future, is that it’s a finicky creature who never does what you think it will.  😉

– Mark Tortorici
Founder & Training Expert
Transform Talent Acquisition

The Power of TMTOWTDI in Talent Acquisition – Part II

Part II of Our @ATCevent #SST2014 Series

Last week we talked about the power of TMTOWTDI (pronouced TIM-TOADY) in sourcing.  The idea is that there is more than one way to source for a req.  Now today we will talk about the next steps in the process: Candidate Engagement and Attraction.  When reaching out to candidates via email and the phone, what is the correct way to approach them?  What is the best way to message them?

The real question you should be asking is: What do you have that they want?  This is a very simple question with a host of complex answers that are changing all the time.  There is only one way that you will get the answers you need.  By PICKING UP THE PHONE AND TALKING TO THE CANDIDATE!

Now I know that I sound angry by typing in all caps, but I’m really trying to drive home this point:  Too many sourcers and recruiters are afraid to pick up the phone and instead only do what is called “email recruiting”.  The problem with that method is that it’s difficult to get an honest (or close to honest) read of the candidate.    We live in a world where people can hide.  They hide behind emails, they hide behind social profiles, they hide behind comments on websites.  This technological separation between people allows them a certain level of protection and feeling of bravery.  The downside is that the candidate’s answers are not spontaneous, they are edited many times over, and sometimes they are not even their own answers!

The Power of TMTOWTDI in Talent Acquisition – Part I

If you are a programmer, you understand the meaning and power that TMTOWTDI (pronounced TIM-TOADY) can give you.  It originates from the world of Perl but also programming practices in general  it means that for every solution to a problem, there is more than one way to do it.  There are different ways to write the code in order to achieve the desired results.

Now before I receive an onslaught of emails from programmers, I also agree that the simplest, cleanest solution is usually the best for coding and low overhead in a software program.

But for candidate attraction, we need more than one way to find those candidates and attract them to the company.  How many ways can this be done?  The answer is as many as you can imagine.  Even if you use the simplest method in the world for finding candidates, that does not necessarily guarantee a hire.  So instead, you picture what the perfect candidate profile looks like, and then devise many different paths to get to that candidate profile.  If you just rely on one method, whether simple or esoteric, you are missing out on candidates and possible hires.

It Starts with the Req

Let’s take this Environmental Engineer req in Sydney, Australia:

” Track record in  power/energy and civil infrastructure projects.  Senior Environmental Engineer with heavy civil engineering experience.

Follow the Process…Even in an Ocean of Candidates

Mark looking for potential candidates

While having an email exchange with my friend Lisa Amorao (@leese), she mentioned to me a certain req that she needed filled.  As we talked, I figured out that this was a req unlike most.  As we went back and forth about what she was looking for, I was reminded about always sticking to the sourcing process, no matter what the req.

Here’s a quick background about Lisa for the story: Besides being an avid Social Marketer in the staffing industry, Lisa is also an open-water / cold-water swimming fanatic.  Whether it’s around the SF Bay Area, or anyplace that she travels to (provided there’s a nearby ocean), she will be there swimming.  She mentioned to me that she needed to find a Cold-Water Swim Coach, or as she put it, a Cold Water Sherpa.

Now I immediately realized that the “Cold Water Sherpa” title might not be an officially recognized one, so I did what any right minded sourcer would do, follow the sourcing process:

• Conduct the req intake meeting (or as we call it, the req huddle)
• Ask questions during the req huddle to clarify, and pitch alternative profile ideas
• Find out what the “must haves” are, and think of multiple ways to find those qualifications
• Talk about places that these candidates might hang out at (besides the beach…DUH!)

The Req:

So here is what the req ended up being:

It’s Tool Time: Google’s Personal Blocklist

That’s right, ladies and gentlemen!  It’s Tool Time!  That is, tools for your web browser and tools to help automate your sourcing life.

Last week at a conference, I was talking to a like-minded sourcing guru/technophile.  You know him by his real name: Dean Da Costa.  As we talked about sourcing tools, add-ons, extensions, and whatnot, we talked about blocking domains from search results on Google.

Now for years I have used a Greasemonkey (or Tampermonkey for Chrome users) script called “Google Domain Blocker”.  It’s a very cool script that blocks domains of your choice from showing up in your Google results.

Setting this up was a 2-step process: Download Greasemonkey (for FF) or Tampermonkey (for Chrome) and then go to userscripts.org to find the javascript.  The process wasn’t all that difficult.

But after my conversation with Dean when I told him about the Greasemonkey script, he told me about Personal Blocklist (by Google).

This new extension is a very good thing.  Not only is it a one-click effort to add it to Chrome, but just like with the Tampermonkey script, you can import & export your list of blocked domains.  And also, it’s apparently made by the big G.

Now why is this the most important thing in the world for you?  I’m glad you asked!

Crossing Over to the Other Side – From Agency to Corporate

Hiring Technical Recruiter or Sourcer with agency background experience has always been a trend. Why is this? What are the skills that agency recruiters and sourcers have that make them appealing to leaders of corporate staffing teams? Also, if you do work on the agency side but want to break into corporate, what do you have to do? Do you possess the skills that will make you marketable to a staffing team on the corporate side? Of course, just because you work at an agency doesn’t guarantee that you are instantly AWESOME. You still have to be good at your job. Here are some of the transferable skills that are needed in order to cross over to the other side. And why corporate staffing managers should pay attention.

Skills to Pay the Bills

If you have a good agency recruiter or sourcer who is on your doorstep applying for a job, then here are some the skills that will be of benefit to you:

• Time management – I you’re thinking: Well yeah, duh!!! Of course recruiters have to be good at time management. But agency staffers have to source, recruit, and submit candidates for new jobs opened THAT DAY. Sometimes within a couple of HOURS!
• Competitive – Of course everyone in staffing is competitive. Companies are all vying for the same top talent and there is only so much to go around. But in the agency world, you are normally competing with 30 or so staffing agencies on the SAME JOB. You can bet agency staffers are competitive and FAST. Their ability to identify, qualify, and submit candidates quickly is their livelihood.
• All around technical knowledge – Most corporate recruiters and sourcers work within a single vertical or group. They usually have 5 to 10 open reqs they are working for the length of their stay at the company. Agency staffers receive multiple new reqs each day from a wide variety of clients. This means over the course of a few days, a recruiter could work on an IC Design Engineer, a Software Validation Engineer for a biotech company, then move on to a Techno-Functional Oracle ERP implementation consultant, tackle a DevOps engineers with cloud platform experience, before finally wrapping up with a Finance Manager who has EFT / ACH systems experience.
• Ability to work without hiring manager req intake meetings– Because many agencies are RPO, VMS, or contingency-based, they often times have no contact with the hiring manager. They do not typically get clarification, job insights, or what’s written between the lines of the req. Because of that, agency recruiters and sourcers must use their experience, instincts, and research skills in order to figure out the correct angle when working a req.

When the Boss Asks for the Inconceivable: Sourcers Must Call Candidates!

If you’re a sourcer and thinking about this headline, you might start having an anxiety attack, sweating profusely, talking like Porky Pig, or begin planning how you will get out of your current contract in order to avoid the phone.  (And if you weren’t thinking about this before, you certainly are now!)

Fear not, true believers!  This is something that you have experience with already.  It’s called: communication.  You’ve been doing it your whole life since you could talk and believe it or not, it’s been with people that you’ve never spoken to before.  Of course as we grow older from our childhood into adults, there are seemingly more roadblocks, timing issues, and weird personalities to deal with.  But really it still boils down to a simple exchange of information between two people.

When sourcing first started, it was usually a name generation or pure research role.  Sourcers “supported” the recruiter through their candidate generation efforts.  But over the last decade that has progressed.  The sourcer is also becoming a candidate engagement specialist or even the recruiter.  Now I realize this is not the structure in every company, but times are changing and will continue to change.  For budget reasons, headcount, or to speed up the hiring the process,   we will continuously see the roles of sourcer and recruiter blend.  The recruiters will get better at sourcing even if it’s only for a short time during the day, and the sourcers will get better at contacting candidates and speeding up the hand-offs in the hiring process.

Guilty by Association

Professional Associations and organizations are a great source of passive candidates.  These groups focus on an industry or a discipline, and allow people with similar interests to network together.  The group’s focus can be technical or functional (G&A).  The larger ones have local chapters throughout the nation.

Functional (G&A) Examples:

• AAA (American Accounting Association) – For Accountants, Finance Specialists, Controllers, etc.
• AMA (American Marketing Association) – Dedicated to serving the educational and professional needs of marketing executives
• CSCMP (Council for Supply Chain Management Professionals) – Worldwide professional association dedicated to the advancement and dissemination of research and knowledge on supply chain management
• SHRM (Society of Human Resource Management) – Largest organization for HR professionals including HR Generalists, HR Managers, HR Diversity, HR Business Partners, Compensation, Benefits, Employee Relations, and University Relations

Technical Examples:

• ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) – Known for Mechanical Engineering, but also collaboration, knowledge sharing and skill development across all engineering disciplines, standards, and certifications
• IACSIT (International Association of Computer Science and information) – For Computer Science and Information Technology
• INCOSE (International Council on Systems Engineering) – Dedicating to the advancement of systems engineering
• IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) – The largest engineering association in the world with a focus in Electrical and IT/Systems Engineering